Partner
Jeff Totten focuses on trial-level patent and trade secret litigation, post-grant validity challenges, and strategic client counseling in the mechanical and electrical fields. He enjoys helping clients achieve their business goals in court, at the Patent Office, and across the negotiating table.
Jeff represents clients in patent and trade secret matters in U.S. district courts and before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), including stand-up roles in bench and jury trials. In addition to trial work, Jeff has extensive experience managing litigation teams involved in complex intellectual property disputes; developing, briefing, and arguing claim construction and summary judgment positions; selecting and working with technical experts; and taking discovery in the United States and abroad. He also assists clients with appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jeff has represented patent owners and petitioners in dozens of post-grant validity challenges before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). His work includes presenting oral arguments, preparing petitions and patent owner replies, taking PTAB discovery, and coordinating PTAB proceedings with ongoing district court litigation. Jeff has also helped clients prepare for potential derivation proceedings at the PTAB.
Jeff provides clients with strategic counsel, pre-litigation assessments, and opinions of counsel. He writes opinions regarding patent infringement and validity. He counsels clients regarding patent inventorship and ownership, derivation, and trade secrets. He also assists clients with patent prosecution, portfolio management, and strategic planning.
Jeff serves as a leader of Finnegan's manufacturing industry working group. He presents seminars and webinars on IP issues facing manufacturing companies and has advised multiple manufacturing companies on the impact wide-spread adoption of additive manufacturing and 3D printing will have on their IP portfolios.
In his pro bono practice, Jeff has represented criminal defendants in misdemeanor and felony cases before the D.C. Superior Court.
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbine Generators and Components Thereof
337-TA-1218, ITC, Judge Cheney
General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
Represented patent owner in a series of inter partes review challenges and related appeals to pioneering technology on next-generation aircraft engines. Successfully secured non-institution of several proceedings and claims, and in several cases that proceeded to final written decision, persuaded the Board to confirm some or all of the challenged claims.
IPR2016-00524, -00527, -00531, -00533, -00855, -00857, -00952, -01286, -01304, IPR2017-00428, -00431, -00999, -01123, -01489, PTAB, Judges Renya, Taranto, Hughes, Jung, Rice, Wood, Daniels, Abraham, Crumbley, Tornquist, Weatherly, Hoskins, Lee, Homere, Bisk, Snedden, Yang, Pollock
Cambria Company LLC v. Cosentino SA
6:20-cv-00894, -00895, -00896, -00897, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
6:20-cv-01080, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
IPR2021-00214, -00215, -00216; PGR2021-00010, -00090, PTAB, Judges Kalan, Ross, Kaiser
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP v. Xcential Corp. et al.
As lead counsel in derivation proceeding, analyzed inventorship dispute, and prepared derivation petition regarding unauthorized filing of patent application by potential vendor. Counseled client on derivation petitions and procedures, as well as interplay with contract and trade secret claims.
DER2022-00004, PTAB, Judges Arbes, Lee, Kennedy
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp. v. POSCO
2:12-cv-02429, D.N.J., Judges Cavanaugh, Chesler, Falk, Waldor
15-0112, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Newman
Podcasts
Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 2 Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 2
October 13, 2025
Podcasts
Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 1 Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 1
October 8, 2025
Webinar
Relying on the POSITA in Patent Prosecution: Impact of General Knowledge on Patentability/Validity Relying on the POSITA in Patent Prosecution: Impact of General Knowledge on Patentability/Validity
May 23, 2023
Webinar
Podcasts
Director Review of Code200 v. Bright Data Director Review of Code200 v. Bright Data
November 17, 2022
Commentary
Finnegan Team Secures $240M Jury Verdict After PTAB Success Finnegan Team Secures $240M Jury Verdict After PTAB Success
February 3, 2026
Managing Intellectual PropertyCommentary
How We Won: Promptu Counsel on Its $240M Victory Against Comcast How We Won: Promptu Counsel on Its $240M Victory Against Comcast
February 2, 2026
World Intellectual Property ReviewMedia Mention
Law360's Legal Lions of The Week - Promptu Law360's Legal Lions of The Week - Promptu
January 30, 2026
Law360Media Mention
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Promptu Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Promptu
January 30, 2026
The AmLaw Litigation DailyMedia Mention
Comcast Hit With $240M Verdict in Voice Recognition IP Trial Comcast Hit With $240M Verdict in Voice Recognition IP Trial
January 27, 2026
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.