直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Post-Grant Reviews to Grow in Number, but as a Niche Tool

May 18, 2017

Law360

When it comes to Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings, the number of petitions challenging patents under post-grant review is no comparison to the 6,100 petitions filed under inter partes review (as of the beginning of April 2017). However, attorneys expect post-grant reviews to increase from the few dozen filed to date.

Post-grant reviews present challenges that inter partes reviews do not have. For example, post-grant reviews permit challengers to argue that a patent claims ineligible subject matter or lacks a required written description and they are available only for patents that have issued relatively recently. Under these guidelines, few patents qualify for review. But as more such patents issue in the years to come, post-grant reviews will become a significant part of many patent disputes, attorneys say. Finnegan attorney Jason E. Stach said, "In the future, every patent will be an AIA patent that is eligible for review, so we will see an uptick as there are more and more AIA patents."

Related Practices

特許庁における無効審判

PTABにおける無効手続:当事者系レビューおよび特許付与後レビュー

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP