直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

MGA Entertainment's Infringement of Laser Board Game Patent Did Not Warrant Trebled Damages

April 29, 2015

IP Law Daily

On April 29, the Federal Circuit ruled that a district court erred in tripling a jury’s damage award against Finnegan client MGA Entertainment. In 2007, Innovention Toys filed suit against MGA Entertainment for infringement of its laser board game patent. Initially, the district court found that the patent was valid and infringed by MGA. MGA appealed and while the Federal Circuit affirmed the infringement ruling, the court vacated and remanded the nonobviousness determination due to the district court excluding key prior-art references and incorrectly determining the level of ordinary skill in the art to be that of a layperson. Following the remand, the jury found that the patent was not obvious and that MGA’s infringement was willful. The jury awarded approximately $1.4 million in lost-profit damages to Innovention and then tripled the damage award because of MGA’s alleged willful infringement. Innovention was also awarded $1.8 million in attorney fees in a separate ruling. On appeal, MGA challenged the willful infringement determination and the Federal Circuit ruled that it was an error for the district court to conclude that MGA’s infringement was willful. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s willful infringement ruling and vacated the enhanced damages and attorney fees. 

Tags

damages, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), willful infringement

Related Practices

グローバルな知的財産権利の執行、訴訟、および裁判

Related Industries

消費財

Related News

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List

June 24, 2026

Commentary

Will the Chicago Cubs Win Their Game Over 'The Rooftop Phenomenon'?

June 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Commentary

Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks

April 24, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 24, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP