December 11, 2014
On December 4, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Bloomberg BNA contacted Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill to provide comment on the scope of the coverage of Apple's design patents and the amount of damages that can be expected. Ferrillnoted that while counsel did not disagree the patents at issue each covered “a slice of the iPhone,” they did disagree on the impact the “functional elements” of design would have on “the overall impression of the claimed ornamental features." Ferrill also noted “an uphill battle” with regard to Samsung’s damages argument.
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.