December 11, 2014
On December 4, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Bloomberg BNA contacted Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill to provide comment on the scope of the coverage of Apple's design patents and the amount of damages that can be expected. Ferrillnoted that while counsel did not disagree the patents at issue each covered “a slice of the iPhone,” they did disagree on the impact the “functional elements” of design would have on “the overall impression of the claimed ornamental features." Ferrill also noted “an uphill battle” with regard to Samsung’s damages argument.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Commentary
Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge
September 11, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.