Experience
Superior Graphite Co.
TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.
Successfully represented TIMCAL, in a patent litigation involving a method for producing expanded graphite.
Superior Graphite Co. v. TIMCAL S.A., Ltd., 1:03-cv-04904, N.D. Ill., Judge Gottschall
Superior Graphite Co. v. TIMCAL S.A., Ltd., 1:04-mc-00038, N.D. Ohio, Judge Polster
Sonix Tech. Co., Ltd. v. VTech Electronics North America, LLC
VTech Electronics North America, LLC
W.R. Grace & Co. v. Viskase Corp.
W.R. Grace & Co.
Human Sciences HC Ltd. v. FedEx Corp.
FedEx Corp.
Wonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd. v. Kids II, Inc.
Wonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd.
W.R. Grace
Tenneco Inc.
Fisher Paykel v. LG Electronics
LG Electronics
Acrox Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
Acrox Technologies Co., Ltd.
Protecting the patents of a household name
LG Electronics
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.