直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan secures dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction for client SK Innovation

Celgard, LLC

SK Innovation Co. Ltd.

Finnegan defended Korea-based client SK Innovation (SKI) in a patent infringement suit against plaintiff Celgard LLC in the Western District of North Carolina, where Celgard is located. After extensive jurisdictional discovery, the court granted SKI’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and denied Celgard’s motion for preliminary injunction. Finnegan also obtained relief from the court for SKI after it was discovered that Celgard sent SKI confidential information to Celgard’s Korean counsel in unrelated Korean proceedings between the parties. The relief included prohibition of further transmission of SKI confidential information to Celgard’s Korean counsel and a bar against each of Celgard’s Korean attorneys who viewed SKI confidential information from further work on the Korean proceedings. Celgard appealed the district court’s dismissal of the case to the Federal Circuit. Finnegan represented SKI in the appeal as well. After full briefing and an oral argument, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the case, securing SKI’s victory on the issue of personal jurisdiction.

Celgard, LLC v. SK Innovation Co. Ltd., 3:13-cv-00254, W.D.N.C., Judges Cayer, Cogburn

Celgard, LLC v. SK Innovation Co. Ltd., 14-1807, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Reyna, Wallach

Related Professionals

Charles H. Suh
Partner
Seoul
+82 2 6454 7301
Email
Smith R. Brittingham
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4158
Email
J. Michael Jakes
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Related Industries

Chemical

Electrical and Computer Technology

Energy

Related Experiences

SK Innovation Co., Ltd. v. Celgard, LLC

SK Innovation Co., Ltd.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LP v. Apple Inc.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC; Rembrandt Secure Computing

District court rules in favor of Finnegan client AbbVie

AbbVie Inc.

Finnegan trial team defeats $260 million patent and trade dress suit for clients ABBYY Software and Lexmark

ABBYY Software, Ltd., Lexmark

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Federal Circuit reverses district court ruling of invalidity and upholds rulings on other grounds in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

Federal Circuit affirms claim construction and summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Finnegan client Pergo

Pergo LLC

Finnegan client FedEx secures dismissal of suit involving WebXchange (and Pi-Net) patent portfolio

FedEx Corp.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Apotex Corp.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP