Experience
Apple Inc.
VirnetX
Apple filed seven inter partes review (IPR) petitions challenging several patents owned by Finnegan client VirnetX more than a year after it was served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patents. Finnegan secured non-institution decisions for VirnetX through arguments in its patent owner’s preliminary responses to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that Apple was time-barred under 35 U.S.C. 315(b) from requesting IPR of the challenged patents.
Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, IPR2013-00348, -00349, -00354, -00393, -00394, -00397, -00398, PTAB, Judges Easthom, Medley, Siu, Tierney
New Bay Capital, LLC v. VirnetX, Inc.
VirnetX, Inc.
Microsoft Corp. v. VirnetX Inc.
VirnetX Inc.
Biogen MA Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.