直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Reversal of a $30 million judgment against NOVA’s plastics line

Dow Chemical Company

NOVA Chemicals

The Federal Circuit handed Finnegan client NOVA Chemicals a victory on appeal, finding Dow Chemical’s patent claims to be invalid. In a prior appeal, the Federal Circuit held that NOVA had infringed Dow’s ethylene polymer patent claims and that NOVA had not established that those claims were invalid for indefiniteness. In a subsequent appeal concerning the district court’s award of supplemental damages, the Federal Circuit held that an intervening Nautilus decision by the Supreme Court had changed the law of indefiniteness and that the prior panel had applied a test for indefiniteness that had been repudiated by the Supreme Court. Finding that Dow’s patent claims were indefinite under the correct test, the Federal Circuit reversed a $30 million supplemental damage award and dismissed Dow’s cross-appeal for enhanced damages as moot.

Dow Chemical Company v. NOVA Chemicals, 1:05-cv-00737, D. Del., Judges Farnan, Stark

NOVA Chemicals v. Dow Chemical Company, 14-1431, -1462, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Prost, Wallach

Related Professionals

Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4092
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

Chemical

Energy

Related Experiences

Reversal of a $46 million judgment against a world leader in personal care, Conair

Conair

A reversal of a $70+ million judgment against Mattel and popular “Hot Wheels” toys

Mattel

Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication

TCL Communication Technology

Patent ownership and licensing dispute dismissed on summary judgment for computer graphics company

S3 Graphics Co. Ltd.

District court grants summary judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Toyota against Solomon Technologies, Inc.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Federal Circuit affirms $6.5 million damages award for Finnegan client Telcordia Technologies from Cisco Systems

Telcordia Technologies

Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc. v. Sicor, Inc.

Astellas Pharma U.S.

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems v. Medtronic Vascular

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems

$45 million judgment overturned for Ericsson

Ericsson Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP