Experience
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc.
Under Armour, Inc.
Defeated demand for a preliminary injunction on a design patent claim that would have prohibited Under Armour's sale of its new batting helmet line for two years.
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc. v. Under Armour, Inc., 2:10-cv-00933, W.D. Wash., Judge Pechman
F5 Networks, Inc. v A10 Networks, Inc.
A10 Networks, Inc.
Zymogenetics, Inc. v. Immunex Corp.
Immunex Corp.
REC Software USA, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA, Inc.
LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Finnegan secures strategic damages award for Under Armour in trademark infringement litigation
Under Armour
Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.
AOL, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc. v. Salt Armour, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc. v. Energy Armor, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Under Armour, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.