直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

5th Market, Inc. v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

5th Market, Inc.

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Represented CME in two Federal Circuit appeals from covered business method (“CBM”) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

5th Market, Inc. v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc., 15-1785, -1787; 16-1151, Fed. Cir.

Related Professionals

Charles T. Collins-Chase
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4108
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Communications

Financial Services and Business Systems

Related Experiences

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc.

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Trading Technologies, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.

Trading Technologies, Inc.

Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Movea, Inc.

Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.

Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc. 

Trading Technologies International, Inc.

Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc. 

Prolitec Inc.

Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Cox Communications v. Sprint Communication Co.

Sprint Communication Co.

Kinetic Technologies, Inc. v. Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.

Kinetic Technologies, Inc.

Federal Circuit decisions in IPRs challenging patentability of patents related to aseptic food processing

Nestle USA, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP