Experience
Medtronic, Inc.
Cardiac Pacemakers
Represented exclusive licensee Cardiac Pacemakers in case involving patent on implantable cardiac stimulators to treat heart failure; after bench trial, won declaratory judgment that patent is valid, which was affirmed on appeal by Federal Circuit.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Cardiac Pacemakers, 1:07-cv-00823, D. Del., Judges Robinson, Stark
Medtronic, Inc. v. Cardiac Pacemakers, 15-1996, -2074, -2075, Fed. Cir., Judges Linn, Reyna, Wallach
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems v. Medtronic Vascular
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.
Prolitec Inc.
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.
Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds
Syngenta Seeds
NetMoneyIN, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc.
Verisign, Inc.
Guidant Corp. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cardiac Pacemakers Inc.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.