直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

US Synthetic secures ITC exclusion order barring polycrystalline diamond compacts (PDCs)

US Synthetic Corporation

Achieving precedent in preserving valuable patents for Lumify®

Eye Therapies, LLC

Finnegan client Maglula delivers crushing blow to Amazon’s arbitration practices over counterfeit products

Maglula, Ltd.

Finnegan secures $180M for CSRC in complex arbitrations

CSRC et al.

Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca AB

Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini

Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Eisai, leading to major strategic collaboration agreement

Eisai Co., Ltd.

Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Recent Experience

Experience

AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alvotech hf. AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alvotech hf.

1:21-cv-02258, 1:21-cv-02899, N.D. Ill., Judge Lee

Experience

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc. Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc.

106,113; 106,114, PTAB, Judges Lane, Moore, Katz

Experience

William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. v. CG Technology Development, LLC William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. v. CG Technology Development, LLC

IPR2019-00317, -00319, -00320, PTAB, Judges Weatherly, Hoskins, Majors

Experience

Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products

15-1177, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Hughes, Lourie, Moore, Newman, O'Malley, Prost, Reyna, Taranto, Wallach

Experience

Smith & Nephew v. ConforMIS, Inc. Smith & Nephew v. ConforMIS, Inc.

IPR2016-01874; IPR2017-00115, -00307, -00372, -00373, -00487, -00488, -00510, -00511, -00544, -00545, -00778, -00779, -00780, -00983, -00984, PTAB, Judges Bunting, Scanlon, Weiker, Worth

Experience

Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Cook, Inc. et al. Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Cook, Inc. et al.

1:10-cv-11646, D. Mass., Judge Woodlock

Experience

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc.

CBM2013-00027; CBM2014-00114; CBM2015-00061, PTAB, Judges Chang, Braden, Deshpande, Lee, Zecher
USPTO Control No. 95/002,032, PTAB, Judge Carlson

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP