Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca AB
Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini
Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
No confusion in trademark victory on summary judgment for the American Retirement Association
American Retirement Association
Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark
Sony Group Corporation
Experience
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alvotech hf. AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alvotech hf.
1:21-cv-02258, 1:21-cv-02899, N.D. Ill., Judge Lee
Experience
Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc. Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc.
106,113; 106,114, PTAB, Judges Lane, Moore, Katz
Experience
William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. v. CG Technology Development, LLC William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. v. CG Technology Development, LLC
IPR2019-00317, -00319, -00320, PTAB, Judges Weatherly, Hoskins, Majors
Experience
Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products
15-1177, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Hughes, Lourie, Moore, Newman, O'Malley, Prost, Reyna, Taranto, Wallach
Experience
Smith & Nephew v. ConforMIS, Inc. Smith & Nephew v. ConforMIS, Inc.
IPR2016-01874; IPR2017-00115, -00307, -00372, -00373, -00487, -00488, -00510, -00511, -00544, -00545, -00778, -00779, -00780, -00983, -00984, PTAB, Judges Bunting, Scanlon, Weiker, Worth
Experience
Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Cook, Inc. et al. Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Cook, Inc. et al.
1:10-cv-11646, D. Mass., Judge Woodlock
Experience
Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. 5th Market Inc.
CBM2013-00027; CBM2014-00114; CBM2015-00061, PTAB, Judges Chang, Braden, Deshpande, Lee, Zecher
USPTO Control No. 95/002,032, PTAB, Judge Carlson
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.