直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

US Synthetic secures ITC exclusion order barring polycrystalline diamond compacts (PDCs)

US Synthetic Corporation

Achieving precedent in preserving valuable patents for Lumify®

Eye Therapies, LLC

Finnegan client Maglula delivers crushing blow to Amazon’s arbitration practices over counterfeit products

Maglula, Ltd.

Finnegan secures $180M for CSRC in complex arbitrations

CSRC et al.

Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca AB

Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini

Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Eisai, leading to major strategic collaboration agreement

Eisai Co., Ltd.

Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Recent Experience

Experience

Incyte Corporation et al. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited et al. Incyte Corporation et al. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited et al.

2:24-cv-06944, D.N.J., Judge Padin

Experience

Rare PTAB rehearing request granted for Finnegan client Incyte Rare PTAB rehearing request granted for Finnegan client Incyte

IPR2017-01256, PTAB, Judges Fitzpatrick, Hulse, Yang, Smith, Franklin
19-2011, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughs, Linn, Stark

Experience

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Hetero USA Inc., Lupin Limited et al. Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Hetero USA Inc., Lupin Limited et al.

2:23-cv-00094, 2:23-cv-02364, D.N.J., Judges Cecchi, Padin, Wettre

Experience

Risen (Suzhou) Pharma Tech Co., Ltd. v. Alzheon, Inc. Risen (Suzhou) Pharma Tech Co., Ltd. v. Alzheon, Inc.

IPR2022-01200, PGR2022-00051, PTAB, Judges Newman, Snedden, Wisz
22-2232, Fed. Cir.

Experience

Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and Company

IPR2022-00738, -00739, -00796, PTAB, Judges Cotta, Wisz, Worth
1:21-cv-10954, D. Mass., Judge Burroughs

Experience

CMC Materials, LLC v. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al. CMC Materials, LLC v. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al.

1:20-cv-00738, D. Del., Judge Hall

Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al.

Experience

Nanosys, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas et al. Nanosys, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas et al.

IPR2020-00503, PTAB, Judges Abraham, Guest, Heaney

Experience

SFC Co., Ltd. v. LG Chem, Ltd. SFC Co., Ltd. v. LG Chem, Ltd.

IPR2020-00178, -00182, PTAB, Judges Kalan, Kaiser, Abraham

Experience

Finnegan persuades PTAB that all claims in high-pressure tubular polyethylene manufacturing process and apparatus patent are unpatentable - Equistar Chemicals, LP v. ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc., IPR2017-01534, PTAB

Finnegan persuades PTAB that all claims in high-pressure tubular polyethylene manufacturing process and apparatus patent are unpatentable Finnegan persuades PTAB that all claims in high-pressure tubular polyethylene manufacturing process and apparatus patent are unpatentable

IPR2017-01534, PTAB, Judges Abraham, Roesel, Tornquist

Experience

Finnegan successfully defends Incyte against institution of PGR proceeding Finnegan successfully defends Incyte against institution of PGR proceeding

PGR2017-00034, PTAB, Judges Paulraj, Sawert, Snedden

Experience

Eli Lilly and Company v. Actavis Labs. UT Inc. Eli Lilly and Company v. Actavis Labs. UT Inc.

1:16-cv-01119, E.D. Va., Judges Nachmanoff, Trenga

Experience

Eli Lilly and Company v. Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Eli Lilly and Company v. Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

IPR2014-00693, -00752, PTAB, Judges Green, Prats, Snedden
16-1547, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Moore, Newman

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP