直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

US Synthetic secures ITC exclusion order barring polycrystalline diamond compacts (PDCs)

US Synthetic Corporation

Achieving precedent in preserving valuable patents for Lumify®

Eye Therapies, LLC

Finnegan client Maglula delivers crushing blow to Amazon’s arbitration practices over counterfeit products

Maglula, Ltd.

Finnegan secures $180M for CSRC in complex arbitrations

CSRC et al.

Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca AB

Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini

Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

Finnegan tees up valuable patents for Eisai, leading to major strategic collaboration agreement

Eisai Co., Ltd.

Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Recent Experience

Experience

In re Lumify

In re Lumify

3:21-cv-16766, D.N.J., Judges Kirsch, Singh
IPR2022-00146, PTAB, Judges Hulse, New, Pollock
IPR2024-00467, PTAB, Judges Flax, Pollock, Yang
IPR2022-00142, PTAB, Judges Flax, Hulse, New, Pollock

Experience

Bausch Health Ireland Limited et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited et al.

Bausch Health Ireland Limited et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited et al.

2:23-cv-00170, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:21-cv-00611, D. Del., Judge Stark
1:22-cv-00085, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:21-cv-00573, W.D. Pa., Judges Cercone, Hardy
1:22-cv-00020, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:21-cv-10057, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:21-cv-10403, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:23-cv-03333, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:24-cv-00036, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:24-cv-07182, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:24-cv-11179, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:25-cv-00003, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
IPR2023-00016, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Valek
IPR2022-00722, - 01102, -01103, -01104, -01105, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Snedden, Valek

Experience

Jumio Corporation v. FaceTec, Inc.

Jumio Corporation v. FaceTec, Inc.

IPR2025-00106, -00107, -00108, -00109, PTAB, Judges Khan, Hoang, Baer

Experience

Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC

1:22-cv-01280, D. Del.

Experience

Bayer Cropscience LP et al. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC et al. Bayer Cropscience LP et al. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.

N22C-07-168, Delaware Superior Court, Complex Commercial Litigation Division

Experience

Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto Company et al. Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Monsanto Company et al.

1:22-cv-01046, D. Del., Judge Williams

Experience

Bay Materials, LLC v. 3M Company Bay Materials, LLC v. 3M Company

1:21-cv-01610, D. Del., Judges Andrews, Hall

Experience

 Arvinas Operations, Inc. et al. v. Qian et al.

 Arvinas Operations, Inc. et al. v. Qian et al.

3:22-cv-00717, D. Conn., Judges Chatigny, Richardson

Experience

Sandoz Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH et al. Sandoz Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH et al.

PGR2022-00037, PTAB, Judges Newman, Obermann, Worth

Experience

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland Ltd. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland Ltd.

IPR2022-00722, -01102, -01103, -01104, -01105, IPR2023-00016, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Sheridan, Valek
26-1595, Fed. Cir.
1:21-cv-00611, D. Del., Judge Stark
2:21-cv-10057, -10403, 2:23-cv-00170, -03333, 2:24-cv-07182, -11179, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:21-cv-00573, W.D. Pa., Judges Cercone, Hardy
1:22-cv-00020, -00085, 1:24-cv-00036, 1:25-cv-00003, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh

Experience

AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alvotech hf. AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alvotech hf.

1:21-cv-02258, 1:21-cv-02899, N.D. Ill., Judge Lee

Experience

Federal Circuit reverses IPR decision, invalidates all claims challenged by Finnegan clients DuPont and Archer-Daniels-Midland - E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. Synvina C.V., 17-1977, Fed. Cir.

Federal Circuit reverses IPR decision, invalidates all claims challenged by Finnegan clients DuPont and Archer-Daniels-Midland Federal Circuit reverses IPR decision, invalidates all claims challenged by Finnegan clients DuPont and Archer-Daniels-Midland

17-1977, Fed. Cir.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP