直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan scores complete victory in PTAB ruling for firm clients Google and Yahoo!

Google, Yahoo!

CreateAds LLC

In response to litigations brought by CreateAds for a computerized “visual design” solutions patent, Google and Yahoo! asked Finnegan to file an inter partes review (IPR) petition to challenge the claims of the asserted patent. The petition addressed all 20 claims of the patent, based on seven different grounds of prior art, and included a declaration from the author of a prior art Master’s Thesis Paper deposited in the MIT library. The IPR was coordinated with the underlying CreateAds consolidated litigations, in which Finnegan also played a significant role in briefing a summary judgment motion to dispose of the patent under 35 U.S.C. 101. After limited discovery and twice rejecting CreateAds’ claim construction proposals, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision finding all 20 claims unpatentable in view of the prior art and maintaining all seven instituted grounds advanced by the Finnegan team.

Google, Yahoo! v. CreateAds LLC, IPR2014-00200, PTAB, Judges Bisk, Boucher, Petravick

Related Professionals

C. Gregory Gramenopoulos
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4263
Email

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

Inter partes reexamination ruling reversed in favor of Finnegan client Asetek

Asetek

Finnegan secures a non-institution decision at the PTAB for client iFLY Holdings LLC

iFLY Holdings LLC

Rare PTAB rehearing request granted for Finnegan client Incyte

Incyte Corp.

Examiner's rejection reversed in favor of Finnegan client Yazaki Corporation

Yazaki Corp.

PTAB rules in favor of Finnegan client Neste Oil Oyj in IPR proceeding

Neste Oyj

Invalidating all patents at issue for gaming client Playtika

Playtika Ltd.

Finnegan goes three-for-three in IPR non-institution decisions for client inMusic

inMusic Brands, Inc.

Finnegan client Capsugel prevails in one of the first U.S. post-grant proceedings

Capsugel Belgium NV

Complete victory for Finnegan clients Nutrichem and Heyi at the ITC

Nutrichem, Heyi

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP