直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan achieves trademark victory on laches for MMA Team Quest gyms

Matthew Lindland; Team Quest Fight Club LLC

Daniel Henderson

Finnegan represented former Olympic silver medalist Matt Lindland and his Team Quest mixed martial arts (MMA) gyms in defense a claim of trademark infringement asserted by a former colleague and well-known UFC fighter, Dan Henderson, on the basis of Lindland’s use of the name Team Quest for MMA facilities and merchandise. Because of Henderson’s knowledge of Lindland’s long standing use of the name, the court held that any relief sought by Henderson with respect to Lindland’s use of the Team Quest name was barred by laches. In particular, the court rejected Henderson’s assertion of inevitable confusion even though both parties showcase fighters in internationally syndicated events and provide online sales of branded merchandise. On appeal, the 9th Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision. Henderson filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which was been denied.

Matthew Lindland; Team Quest Fight Club LLC v. Daniel Henderson, 2:11-cv-01350, C.D. Cal., Judges Bristow, Pregerson

Daniel Henderson v. Matthew Lindland; Team Quest Fight Club LLC, 13-55673, 9th Cir., Judges Bea, Fisher, Friedland

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Related Experiences

Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc.*

Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc.

Global litigation win achieved through careful strategic planning

Swiss Post

Experience_Ninth_Circuit_affirms_dismissal_of_over-reaching_trademark_and_copyright_infringement_complaint_against_Subaru

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of over-reaching trademark and copyright infringement complaint against Subaru

Subaru of America, Inc.

Successful defense of the Toyota MATRIX trademark

Toyota

Finnegan trial team defeats $260 million patent and trade dress suit for clients ABBYY Software and Lexmark

ABBYY Software, Ltd., Lexmark

Finnegan achieves victory for Syneron in cellulite patent suit

Syneron Medical Ltd.

Russell Minoru Ono v. Head USA, Inc.

Head USA, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP