Experience
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company
Tetra Tech Canada, Inc.
Finnegan successfully defended Tetra Tech Canada Inc. (“Tetra Tech”) in a district court action brought by Georgetown Rail Equipment Company (“GREX”), asserting three patents against certain railroad track inspection systems allegedly sold by Tetra Tech. Finnegan filed several inter partes reviews (“IPRs”) against the asserted patents, and leveraged favorable institution decisions to stay the district court case. At the PTAB, Finnegan secured final written decisions in the IPRs, finding all challenged claims unpatentable, leading to the subsequent dismissal of the district court case.
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Tetra Tech Canada, Inc., 6:18-cv-00377, E.D. Tex., Judge Schroeder
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Tetra Tech Canada, Inc., IPR2019-00619, -00620, -00662, -01409, -01581, PTAB, Judges Wood, Lorin, Kalan
Tetra Tech, Inc.
Pavemetrics Systems., Inc. v. Tetra Tech, Inc.
Tetra Tech, Inc.
IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Stragent, LLC v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.
Robert Bosch LLC
NorthStar Systems LLC v. BMW et al.
BMW of North America et al.
Amdocs, Inc.
Blue Spike LLC v. Iris ID Systems, Inc.
Iris ID Systems, Inc.
Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.
LG Electronics Inc. et al.
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd. v. TTE Technology Inc.
TTE Technology Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.