直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.

ClearOne, Inc.

Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.

Represented appellees Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc. and Shure Incorporated in an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit unanimously upheld the validity of Shure’s substitute claims and rejected ClearOne’s procedural challenges to the Board’s ruling. The underlying inter partes review (IPR) was one of the first to utilize the Board’s Motion to Amend Pilot Program.

ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., 21-1517, Fed. Cir., Judges Moore, Newman, Hughes

ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., IPR2019-00683, PTAB, Judges Zecher, Jurgovan, Zado

Tags

substitute claims, motions to amend (MTA), Precedential

Related Professionals

Erika Harmon Arner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 571 203 2754
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email
J. Derek McCorquindale
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2768
Email
Joseph M. Schaffner
Of Counsel
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2725
Email
Alexander M. Boyer
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2759
Email

Related Practices

Appeals from the PTAB

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Experiences

Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations

Intuitive Surgical Operations

Shure Incorporated et al. v. ClearOne, Inc.

Shure Incorporated et al.

Hanwha Q CELLS USA Inc. et al. v. REC Solar Holdings AS et al.

REC Solar Holdings AS et al.

NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.

NetApp, Inc/HPE et al.

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.

Zimmer Holdings, Inc.

R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.

FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,

Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products

Aqua Products, Inc.; Fluidra Group

Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc. 

Prolitec Inc.

Rare PTAB rehearing request granted for Finnegan client Incyte

Incyte Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP