Experience
ClearOne, Inc.
Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
Represented appellees Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc. and Shure Incorporated in an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit unanimously upheld the validity of Shure’s substitute claims and rejected ClearOne’s procedural challenges to the Board’s ruling. The underlying inter partes review (IPR) was one of the first to utilize the Board’s Motion to Amend Pilot Program.
ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., 21-1517, Fed. Cir., Judges Moore, Newman, Hughes
ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., IPR2019-00683, PTAB, Judges Zecher, Jurgovan, Zado
Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.
Shure Incorporated
Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations
Intuitive Surgical Operations
Shure Incorporated et al. v. ClearOne, Inc.
Shure Incorporated et al.
NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.
NetApp, Inc/HPE et al.
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,
Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products
Aqua Products, Inc.; Fluidra Group
Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.
Prolitec Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.