Experience
ClearOne, Inc.
Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
Represented appellees Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc. and Shure Incorporated in an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit unanimously upheld the validity of Shure’s substitute claims and rejected ClearOne’s procedural challenges to the Board’s ruling. The underlying inter partes review (IPR) was one of the first to utilize the Board’s Motion to Amend Pilot Program.
ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., 21-1517, Fed. Cir., Judges Moore, Newman, Hughes
ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc., IPR2019-00683, PTAB, Judges Zecher, Jurgovan, Zado
Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Operations
Intuitive Surgical Operations
Shure Incorporated et al. v. ClearOne, Inc.
Shure Incorporated et al.
Hanwha Q CELLS USA Inc. et al. v. REC Solar Holdings AS et al.
REC Solar Holdings AS et al.
NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.
NetApp, Inc/HPE et al.
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,
Reversing the PTAB in a precedential en banc appeal for Aqua Products
Aqua Products, Inc.; Fluidra Group
Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.
Prolitec Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.