Experience
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al.
ASOS PLC. et al.
In the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Finnegan successfully defended a lace designing and textile manufacturing client over a motion to dismiss against unauthorized use of its laces in front of U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams. In that suit, Judge Abrams allowed Finnegan’s client to continue to pursue its willful copyright infringement claims against an international franchise in the apparel industry.
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al. v. ASOS PLC. et al., 22-cv-09752, S.D.N.Y., Judge Abrams
Linak A/S et al. v. Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al v. Yuneec International Co. Ltd.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al.
Synergy Drone v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Daedalus Blue LLC v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.
Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al. v. Kretek International, Inc., et al.
Swedish Match North America LLC et al.
Innovative Display Techs. LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc., et al.
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Japan Display Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. et al v. Tianma Microelectronics Co.
Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.