Experience
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al.
ASOS PLC. et al.
In the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Finnegan successfully defended a lace designing and textile manufacturing client over a motion to dismiss against unauthorized use of its laces in front of U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams. In that suit, Judge Abrams allowed Finnegan’s client to continue to pursue its willful copyright infringement claims against an international franchise in the apparel industry.
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al. v. ASOS PLC. et al., 22-cv-09752, S.D.N.Y., Judge Abrams
Linak A/S et al. v. Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al v. Yuneec International Co. Ltd.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Synergy Drone v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al.
Innovative Display Techs. LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Japan Display Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. et al v. Tianma Microelectronics Co.
Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd.
Nissei ASB Co., et al. v. R&D Tool & Engineering Co.
Nissei ASB Co., et al.
Goodyear Aerospace Corp., et al. v. B F Goodrich Co.
Goodyear Aerospace Corp.
Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation et al.
ZTE Corporation
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.