直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

A victory at trial for innovator of cardiovascular stents

Abbott Laboratories

Medtronic Inc.

Finnegan won a significant victory for Guidant (now Abbott) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. After a two-week trial, the jury returned a verdict in Guidant’s favor on all counts, finding that all 12 of the asserted patent claims were valid and that all 12 of the accused Medtronic coronary stents infringed the asserted claims. The district court also held that none of the 12 accused Guidant stents infringed any of Medtronic’s four asserted patents and further dismissed Medtronic’s claims against Guidant for trade secret misappropriation and unfair competition.

Abbott Laboratories v. Medtronic Inc., 1:98-cv-00080, D. Del., Judge Robinson

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Trade Secrets

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Related Experiences

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems v. Medtronic Vascular

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems

Trial victory in case involving commercial air conditioner components

York International

Cordis Corp. v. Guidant Inc. (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc.)

Guidant Inc. (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc.)

"Customer defendant" characterization helps Nikon avoid costly protracted litigation and trial

Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc.

Coronary Stent Visualization Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.

Philips Electronic North America Corp.

Bell Communications v. Fore Systems Inc.

Bell Communications

Abbott Laboratories’ dominance in the coronary stent market is protected

Abbott Laboratories

L'Oreal v. Revlon

L'Oreal

Successfully reversing a summary judgment on an innovative surgical method

Origin

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP