直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

IP Update

USPTO Issues Guidance Documents to Implement Final Fee Rules Effective on January 19, 2025

January 17, 2025

By Aaron J. Capron; Jeffrey M. Jacobstein; Mary C. Till; Antoinette E. Nibbs, Ph.D.

Beginning on January 19, 2025, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will be implementing the new patent fees as published in the final rule on November 20, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 91898). In addition to the many across-the-board fee increases, there are some fees and required statements completely new to patent prosecution before the USPTO. Fortunately, the USPTO has provided three guidance documents to assist users in understanding and navigating the new fee schedule. The first document includes questions and answers about the new continuing application fee, that is, the fee required for presenting a benefit claim that establishes an effective benefit date that is greater than 6 years, but less than 9 years before the actual filing date or an effective benefit date that is greater than 9 years before the actual filing date. The continuing application fee guidance includes 21 examples, including how the rules will affect reissue applications. The second document includes questions and answers about the new Information Disclosure Statement fee and certification requirement, and 9 examples of how the agency is applying the rule.  Lastly, the third document is a quick reference guide that addresses general questions and includes several weekend/holiday scenarios that could arise.

For more information

To access these guides, click here.

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Palo Alto, CA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Aaron J. Capron
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6680
Email
Jeffrey M. Jacobstein
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1664
Email
Mary C. Till
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4125
Email
Antoinette E. Nibbs, Ph.D.
Associate
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1649
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP