直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026

July 2, 2026

Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Michelle G. Rice; Jason E. Stach; Elliot C. Cook

In March through May 2026, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a total of 42 opinions in appeals from post-grant proceedings at the PTAB. These are summarized below by month.

In March, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 7 cases (77.78%), including one precedential decision in Implicit, LLC v. Sonos, Inc. (No. 20-1173). The court issued a mixed outcome, in which some issues were affirmed on appeal and some were not, in 2 cases (22.22%). The Court did not issue any dismissals on substantive (e.g., non-settlement) grounds or opinions in which every issue was reversed or vacated.

In April, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 15 cases (75%). The court issued 2 opinions (10%) resulting in a mixed outcome, as well as 2 opinions (10%) where every issue was reversed or vacated. The court dismissed 1 case (5%) on substantive grounds in its precedential opinion in Ironsource Ltd. v. Digital Turbine, Inc. (No. 24-1831).

In May, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 11 cases (84.62%). The court issued 1 precedential opinion (7.69%) in which every issue was reversed or vacated in Federal Express Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated (No. 24-1236). The court issued 1 opinion (7.69%) with a mixed outcome and did not issue any dismissals on substantive grounds.

Through May 31, 2026, the Federal Circuit cumulatively decided 1,611 appeals from the PTAB in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs. While the vast majority of these appeals came from IPR proceedings, the number of PGR appeals has slowly increased over time. In the March-May 2026 timeframe, the court issued two opinions in PGR appeals.

In IPR appeals, the Federal Circuit has cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 1,144 cases (75.07%) and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 183 cases (12.01%).  A mixed outcome on appeal occurred in 155 cases (10.17%), and the court dismissed 42 IPR appeals (2.76%) on substantive (e.g., non-settlement) grounds. 

In PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 21 cases (63.64%), issued a mixed outcome in 3 cases (9.09%), reversed or vacated every issue in 6 cases (18.18%), and dismissed 3 appeals (9.09%) on substantive (e.g., non-settlement) grounds. 

Taken together, in decisions for IPR, CBM, and PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed every issue in 1,206 cases (74.86%), issued a mixed outcome in 162 cases (10.06%), reversed or vacated every issue in 194 cases (12.04%), and dismissed 49 cases on substantive grounds (3.04%).

Of the 1,611 IPR, CBM, and PGR cumulative appeals that it has considered, the Federal Circuit issued Rule 36 affirmances in 667 cases (41.40%).  The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, dismissals, and mixed decisions, in 944 cases (58.60%). The ratio of Rule 36 affirmances to written decisions has generally trended downward over time, although it increased slightly in the March-May 2026 period.

Related Practices

Appeals from the PTAB

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Michelle_Yongyuan_Rice
Michelle G. Rice
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4229
Email
Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email

Copyright © 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP