直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

PTAB Releases Stats on Pilot Programs Aimed at Limiting Appeal Inventory

February 02, 2016

Authored and Edited by Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.; Stephanie M. Sanders

During its PTAB Boardside Chat on February 2, 2016, Lead Judge Jeffrey Robertson provided statistics on the two pilot programs intended to reduce the overall number of appeals pending before the Board: the Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (EPAP) program and the Streamlined Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (S-EPAP) program for Small Entities, both of which have been discussed in previous blog posts.

The following chart provides the statistics cited during the Chat, which are current through January 6, 2016.

  Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (EPAP) Program  Streamlined Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (S-EPAP) Program for Small Entities
Number of petitions filed 22 15
Number of petitions granted 20 10
Number of petitions denied 2 5
Time to decide petition 2 says 11 days

 

Both the EPAP and S-EPAP for Small Entity programs will be available for about a year (from June 19, 2015 to June 20, 2016 for EPAP, and from September 18, 2015 to September 16, 2016 for S-EPAP for Small Entities) or until two thousand (2,000) appeals have been accorded special status under each program, whichever occurs earlier. Based on these initial numbers, it appears that the pilot programs will expire well before that two thousand mark is met.

Tags

Aqua Products v. Matal

Contacts

Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Conference

International Trade Commission Litigation & Enforcement

May 4-5, 2026

Washington, DC

Articles

Choice of Law in Patent Appeals: The Federal Circuit’s Issue-by-Issue Framework

May/June 2026

Articles

Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing

April 24, 2026

IP Updates

PIER Pilot Program - Synopsis

April 09, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2025 - February 2026

March 31, 2026

IP Updates

White House Releases National AI Legislative Framework

March 23, 2026

Conference

2026 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference

March 18-20, 2026

Washington, DC

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP