直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

Drafting for Multiple Jurisdictions Miniseries Part III: Mind Your Language!

October 5, 2020

Authored and Edited by Kyu Yun Kim; Maeve O'Flynn; Ningling Wang; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.; K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.; Thomas Lee Irving; Stacy Lewis*

Many patent owners are interested in trying to draft a single patent application that will serve them in several countries. This is ambitious, since there are many differences between various countries’ patent systems, but perhaps not impossible. The patent drafter just needs to be aware of and try to balance all the different requirements in the single patent application. This series of articles will outline some important considerations when drafting a single patent application. In our first article (available here), we reviewed the grace period provisions in the U.S., Korea, China, and the European Patent Office (“EPO”). In our second article (available here), we looked at how much data should be included on filing. Since the drafting requirements are different in each country, in this article, we will look at language we should be mindful of in drafting a patent application for multijurisdictional use. The article may be found on Finnegan’s AIA blog.

Tags

Drafting for Multiple Jurisdictions Miniseries, patentable subject matter

Related Offices

London

Shanghai

Washington, DC

Contacts

Maeve O'Flynn
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2856
Email
Ningling Wang
Partner
Shanghai
+86 21 6194 2005
Email
Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email
K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2822
Email

*Stacy Lewis is a Law Clerk at Finnegan


Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Charitable

2026 ALYN Hospital Wheels of Love Ride

November 8-12, 2026

Northern District

Conference

2026 TIPA International Symposium

October 30, 2026

Taipei City

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2nd Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation USA & Canada

October 14-16, 2026

New York

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Federal Court Orders Rebel Creamery to Redesign Packaging and Disgorge $23.8 Million in Van Leeuwen Trade Dress Case

October 7, 2026

Articles

U.S. and European Automotive Updates: Installment 2

October 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Distinguishes Patent Eligibility Among Different Communications Systems Claims

October 5, 2026

Articles

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update, March 2026

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: August 2026

September 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP