直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Which International Search Authority Is Right for Me?

September 14, 2020

World Intellectual Property Review

By Maeve O'Flynn; K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.

When filing a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application, applicants must select an international search authority (ISA) to compile the international search report and written opinion. The search report highlights relevant prior art, while the written opinion provides a non-binding opinion on patentability.

This information will likely influence a prosecution strategy in the national and regional phases of the application process. Getting the “right” ISA can be important, but what does “right” mean in this context?

While most receiving offices allow applicants a choice of ISAs, applicants tend to default to their local ISA since that is usually their primary business region, so an early opinion on local patentability issues may be valuable. However, there may be advantages to using a different ISA, depending on the business needs for the application in question.

Read the full article here.

Tags

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Related Offices

London

Related Professionals

Maeve O'Flynn
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2856
Email
K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2822
Email

Originally printed in World Intellectual Property Review on September 14, 2020. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Conference

2026 TIPA International Symposium

October 30, 2026

Taipei City

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

LES 2026 Annual Meeting

October 18-21, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2nd Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation USA & Canada

October 14-16, 2026

New York

Articles

California Court Considers CIPA’s Application to Online Tracking as New Law Limits Private Actions

October 7, 2026

Conference

2026 AIPPI World Congress

October 7-10, 2026

Hamburg

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP