September 14, 2020
World Intellectual Property Review
When filing a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application, applicants must select an international search authority (ISA) to compile the international search report and written opinion. The search report highlights relevant prior art, while the written opinion provides a non-binding opinion on patentability.
This information will likely influence a prosecution strategy in the national and regional phases of the application process. Getting the “right” ISA can be important, but what does “right” mean in this context?
While most receiving offices allow applicants a choice of ISAs, applicants tend to default to their local ISA since that is usually their primary business region, so an early opinion on local patentability issues may be valuable. However, there may be advantages to using a different ISA, depending on the business needs for the application in question.
Read the full article here.
Originally printed in World Intellectual Property Review on September 14, 2020. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
June 30, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.