直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Vidal's New Guidance May Make Fintiv Denials Even Rarer

June 22, 2022

Law360

On June 22, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal issued new guidance on when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) may deny requests to review patents based on parallel litigation. The guidance is intended to clarify when the PTAB should use discretionary denials and to reduce the number of denials. It also clarifies when the PTAB can deny review using Fintiv factors. Finnegan partner Josh Goldberg explained that the number of PTAB denials using Fintiv factors has declined in recent months. He added that the director's guidance memo helps to formalize the PTAB's practices and will make it less likely that a parallel case will cause the PTAB to deny patent review. 

Josh stated, "I think the bottom line is that the memo provides a lot more clarity and a lot more predictability, and it's probably going to reduce the amount of Fintiv denials."

Additionally, the memo explained that the PTAB has stopped denying petitions under Fintiv when there is a parallel International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation, as the ITC does not have the authority to invalidate patents, thus helping to further memorialize the practice. Josh added that until now, "it wasn't publicly stated that this was going to be the way it was, and this was going to apply across the board."

Read "Vidal's New Guidance May Make Fintiv Denials Even Rarer"

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), International Trade Commission (ITC), Fintiv

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Joshua L. Goldberg
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 202 408 6092
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP