直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

USPTO’s PTAB Proposals Under Congress Microscope

May 4, 2023

Managing Intellectual Property

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practitioners are debating whether Congress members did the right thing by questioning the USPTO’s recent Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. During a recent House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet meeting, several members of Congress suggested that the USPTO didn’t have the authority to enact some of the proposed changes. They raised concerns around the deadline to file inter partes review (IPR) petitions, director review, and subject matter eligibility.

Finnegan partner Joshua Goldberg told Managing Intellectual Property that, “A lot of Congress members were expressing desires during the hearing to do something legislatively. But they’re legislators. If they want to do that, they need to do that.”

Some counsel are expecting that because of the outcry, the office will issue a much more modest rule package. However, Josh  says he doesn’t see what the USPTO could do differently. “It may be that some stakeholders don’t like what’s ultimately proposed, but it’s not clear what other option the USPTO has.”

Read “USPTO’s PTAB Proposals Under Congress Microscope”

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP