May 4, 2023
Managing Intellectual Property
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practitioners are debating whether Congress members did the right thing by questioning the USPTO’s recent Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. During a recent House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet meeting, several members of Congress suggested that the USPTO didn’t have the authority to enact some of the proposed changes. They raised concerns around the deadline to file inter partes review (IPR) petitions, director review, and subject matter eligibility.
Finnegan partner Joshua Goldberg told Managing Intellectual Property that, “A lot of Congress members were expressing desires during the hearing to do something legislatively. But they’re legislators. If they want to do that, they need to do that.”
Some counsel are expecting that because of the outcry, the office will issue a much more modest rule package. However, Josh says he doesn’t see what the USPTO could do differently. “It may be that some stakeholders don’t like what’s ultimately proposed, but it’s not clear what other option the USPTO has.”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.