直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

USPTO Must Cater Qualification Rules to Emerging Tech: In-House

October 7, 2021

Managing Intellectual Property

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently expanded the list of academic degree majors that automatically qualify attorneys to sit for the patent bar exam. Various intellectual property professionals agree this is a move in the right direction and hope the list will continue to extend to more degrees in order to attract more diverse practitioners. Managing IP interviewed Finnegan partner Erika Arner to comment on the degree extension. Erika points out that most patents granted by the USPTO involve artificial intelligence (AI) or computer software technology. She states, “If the goal is to attract practitioners who are qualified to assist inventors in getting patents, focusing on the types of patents that are popular would be a helpful next step.”

The USPTO’s decision also allows individuals with eight semester hours of chemistry, physics, or biology (including lab) to apply to sit for the patent bar, removing the requirement of eight sequential semester hours of chemistry or physics with labs in both courses. Erika says she “would encourage the patent office to continue to look for ways to be more flexible.”  

Read “USPTO Must Cater Qualification Rules to Emerging Tech: In-House”

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Prosecution Bar

Related Practices

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Erika Harmon Arner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 571 203 2754
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP