直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

USPTO Must Cater Qualification Rules to Emerging Tech: In-House

October 7, 2021

Managing Intellectual Property

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently expanded the list of academic degree majors that automatically qualify attorneys to sit for the patent bar exam. Various intellectual property professionals agree this is a move in the right direction and hope the list will continue to extend to more degrees in order to attract more diverse practitioners. Managing IP interviewed Finnegan partner Erika Arner to comment on the degree extension. Erika points out that most patents granted by the USPTO involve artificial intelligence (AI) or computer software technology. She states, “If the goal is to attract practitioners who are qualified to assist inventors in getting patents, focusing on the types of patents that are popular would be a helpful next step.”

The USPTO’s decision also allows individuals with eight semester hours of chemistry, physics, or biology (including lab) to apply to sit for the patent bar, removing the requirement of eight sequential semester hours of chemistry or physics with labs in both courses. Erika says she “would encourage the patent office to continue to look for ways to be more flexible.”  

Read “USPTO Must Cater Qualification Rules to Emerging Tech: In-House”

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Prosecution Bar

Related Practices

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Erika Harmon Arner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 571 203 2754
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP