直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Using Power Of DNA, Finnegan Helps Sink Murder Conviction

February 3, 2019

Law360

In November 2018, Superior Court Justice Maynard M. Kirpalani of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts granted Finnegan client Arthur Davis’s motion for a new trial. Mr. Davis has been in prison for 33 years after a 1986 conviction of first degree murder. After several motions for a new trail were denied, Mr. Davis reached out to the New England Innocence Project, who referred the case to Finnegan. The case was a first of its kind for the team of lawyers, including Finnegan lead counsel Christopher Schultz. “Given that all the legal arguments had been made and rejected on appeal, I think it called for an analytical approach whereby we really needed black-and-white scientific evidence that showed Mr. Davis did not commit this crime,” said Schultz.

DNA testing has improved greatly since 1986, and when Massachusetts passed a law to provide greater access to DNA testing of evidence, the team saw an opportunity. Finnegan located the blood evidence used at trial to help convict Mr. Davis. The Commonwealth had presented evidence that blood matching the victim’s type was on Mr. Davis’s belongings, and saliva matching Mr. Davis’s was found on a cigarette at the crime scene. “The real result of the DNA testing here was that the physical evidence was virtually wiped out,” Schultz said.  The team was able to refute both theories, and motioned for a new trial. There is new hope for Mr. Davis after this lengthy process and the support from his legal team has allowed him to keep fighting.  After so many years in prison, Mr. Davis was taken back by the decision. Schultz said. "I think there was significant disbelief when I told him," he said. "After 33 years, I think he was expecting more bad news. So it's fair to say he was shocked."

 

Tags

pro bono

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP