直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Using Power Of DNA, Finnegan Helps Sink Murder Conviction

February 3, 2019

Law360

In November 2018, Superior Court Justice Maynard M. Kirpalani of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts granted Finnegan client Arthur Davis’s motion for a new trial. Mr. Davis has been in prison for 33 years after a 1986 conviction of first degree murder. After several motions for a new trail were denied, Mr. Davis reached out to the New England Innocence Project, who referred the case to Finnegan. The case was a first of its kind for the team of lawyers, including Finnegan lead counsel Christopher Schultz. “Given that all the legal arguments had been made and rejected on appeal, I think it called for an analytical approach whereby we really needed black-and-white scientific evidence that showed Mr. Davis did not commit this crime,” said Schultz.

DNA testing has improved greatly since 1986, and when Massachusetts passed a law to provide greater access to DNA testing of evidence, the team saw an opportunity. Finnegan located the blood evidence used at trial to help convict Mr. Davis. The Commonwealth had presented evidence that blood matching the victim’s type was on Mr. Davis’s belongings, and saliva matching Mr. Davis’s was found on a cigarette at the crime scene. “The real result of the DNA testing here was that the physical evidence was virtually wiped out,” Schultz said.  The team was able to refute both theories, and motioned for a new trial. There is new hope for Mr. Davis after this lengthy process and the support from his legal team has allowed him to keep fighting.  After so many years in prison, Mr. Davis was taken back by the decision. Schultz said. "I think there was significant disbelief when I told him," he said. "After 33 years, I think he was expecting more bad news. So it's fair to say he was shocked."

 

Tags

pro bono

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related News

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP