直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

TTAB Timelines Frustrate Counsel Despite Workarounds

December 2, 2022

Managing Intellectual Property

Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Douglas Rettew regarding the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) timeline when handling trademark oppositions. On average, the pendency time for TTAB trials was 13.6 weeks in the fourth quarter of FY 2022, while it was 12.7 weeks in the third quarter. In Rettew’s view, “That’s not terrible.”

Rettew is working on a case that was fully briefed by November 2021, but still doesn’t have a ruling. Pointing out that district courts often consider a wider variety of factors, he explained, “A federal court could rule, for example, that there’s no likelihood of confusion on the basis that one company uses a house mark in connection with the contested brand. But the TTAB wouldn’t take this issue into account so long as the application didn’t contain the house mark.” 

When commenting about the TTAB’s requirement for parties to conduct discovery conferences, which include discussions about settlement possibilities, Rettew said these requirements help parties determine whether settlements are viable and pave the way for further discussions. He notes, though, that cases don’t usually settle at the discovery conference stage.

Tags

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named a Finalist for The American Lawyer 2026 Industry Awards

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Commentary

Q&A: What the 'GenAI Boom' Means for Patents

August 6, 2026

Commentary

BMW Counsel: How a Supplier Clause Prevented U.S. Trade Secret Litigation

August 3, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP