April 3, 2025
IP Law Daily
Finnegan client Under Armour successfully convinced the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to reject Valiant Praize Productions LLC’s (Valiant) attempt to register a mark. Using the DuPont factors, the TTAB found that several factors support a likelihood of confusion between Valiant’s KINGS ARMOR mark and Under Armour’s UNDER ARMOUR mark, which are both used for clothing.
The TTAB cited that the similarities between the two stem from the use of the word ARMOR or ARMOUR in the British spelling, which was the dominant element of the respective marks and significant in creating the commercial impression of each mark. Both marks are also similar in connotation and commercial impression due to the shared word ARMO(U)R. With that, the TTAB concluded that the first DuPont factor weighs in favor of a conclusion of likelihood of confusion given the marks are more similar than dissimilar with regard to appearance, sound, and commercial impression.
Read “TTAB: KINGS ARMOR Mark for Various Apparel Products Succumbs to Cancellation Challenge”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.