直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

TTAB: KINGS ARMOR Mark for Various Apparel Products Succumbs to Cancellation Challenge

April 3, 2025

IP Law Daily

Finnegan client Under Armour successfully convinced the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to reject Valiant Praize Productions LLC’s (Valiant) attempt to register a mark. Using the DuPont factors, the TTAB found that several factors support a likelihood of confusion between Valiant’s KINGS ARMOR mark and Under Armour’s UNDER ARMOUR mark, which are both used for clothing.

The TTAB cited that the similarities between the two stem from the use of the word ARMOR or ARMOUR in the British spelling, which was the dominant element of the respective marks and significant in creating the commercial impression of each mark. Both marks are also similar in connotation and commercial impression due to the shared word ARMO(U)R. With that, the TTAB concluded that the first DuPont factor weighs in favor of  a conclusion of likelihood of confusion given the marks are more similar than dissimilar with regard to appearance, sound, and commercial impression.

Read “TTAB: KINGS ARMOR Mark for Various Apparel Products Succumbs to Cancellation Challenge”

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Patrick J. Rodgers
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4374
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named a Finalist for The American Lawyer 2026 Industry Awards

August 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP