直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

TTAB: KINGS ARMOR Mark for Various Apparel Products Succumbs to Cancellation Challenge

April 3, 2025

IP Law Daily

Finnegan client Under Armour successfully convinced the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to reject Valiant Praize Productions LLC’s (Valiant) attempt to register a mark. Using the DuPont factors, the TTAB found that several factors support a likelihood of confusion between Valiant’s KINGS ARMOR mark and Under Armour’s UNDER ARMOUR mark, which are both used for clothing.

The TTAB cited that the similarities between the two stem from the use of the word ARMOR or ARMOUR in the British spelling, which was the dominant element of the respective marks and significant in creating the commercial impression of each mark. Both marks are also similar in connotation and commercial impression due to the shared word ARMO(U)R. With that, the TTAB concluded that the first DuPont factor weighs in favor of  a conclusion of likelihood of confusion given the marks are more similar than dissimilar with regard to appearance, sound, and commercial impression.

Read “TTAB: KINGS ARMOR Mark for Various Apparel Products Succumbs to Cancellation Challenge”

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Patrick J. Rodgers
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4374
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List

June 24, 2026

Commentary

IP Notebook: Hugging It Out

June 10, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in the 2026 Legal 500 U.S. Guide

June 10, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP