April 3, 2025
IP Law Daily
Finnegan client Under Armour successfully convinced the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to reject Valiant Praize Productions LLC’s (Valiant) attempt to register a mark. Using the DuPont factors, the TTAB found that several factors support a likelihood of confusion between Valiant’s KINGS ARMOR mark and Under Armour’s UNDER ARMOUR mark, which are both used for clothing.
The TTAB cited that the similarities between the two stem from the use of the word ARMOR or ARMOUR in the British spelling, which was the dominant element of the respective marks and significant in creating the commercial impression of each mark. Both marks are also similar in connotation and commercial impression due to the shared word ARMO(U)R. With that, the TTAB concluded that the first DuPont factor weighs in favor of a conclusion of likelihood of confusion given the marks are more similar than dissimilar with regard to appearance, sound, and commercial impression.
Read “TTAB: KINGS ARMOR Mark for Various Apparel Products Succumbs to Cancellation Challenge”
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.