A federal judge has ruled that Japan-based Toyota Motor Corp. and its U.S. sales unit did not infringe a hybrid vehicle technology patent. Judge Richard A. Jones of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Toyota’s motion for summary judgment on Friday and stated that the patent-in-suit did not satisfy at least one claim limitation. The court had previously construed two limitations of the patent to mean that an engine drives one set of wheels and an electric motor drives a different set of wheels, according to the judge. But in the Prius, Camry, and two-wheel-drive Highlander vehicles, the engine and the electric motor drive the same set of wheels, he pointed out. In fact, plaintiffs' counsel conceded at oral argument that these three vehicles do not infringe the patent for this reason, Judge Jones said. Toyota is represented by Finnegan.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Award/Ranking
September 11, 2026
Commentary
Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge
September 11, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.