直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

The Stranger’s Guide on When to File Patent Continuations

May 10, 2021

Managing Intellectual Property

According to data released in 2020 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), continuation applications–new patent applications that allow filers to pursue additional claims based on the same description and priority date as a pending parent–have tripled over the past decade.

In-house and private practice counsel say the most likely reason for this rise is that continuations are seen as an effective and fairly cost-efficient means of boosting intellectual property portfolios, at least when compared to applying for completely new patents. Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Linda Thayer for her insight.

Linda says patent owners should always file continuations because they act as an insurance policy to help keep patent families alive. “Our default is to always file continuations. If you don’t file a continuation then you’re stuck with the patent that’s been issued.” She added, “A competitor could contest the claims in court in a way that limits the scope of your patents, or a piece of prior art could come to your knowledge after the first patent was issued that could render said patent too broad and thus invalid.” She says a pending continuation allows a patent owner to go back to the parent application and add more elements to the claims that would allow it to survive a new piece of prior art.

Read the full article here.

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP