July 18, 2018
Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property reached to Finnegan attorney Cory Bell for his thoughts on the impact of the Federal Circuit's Berkheimer v. HP decision.
The Berkheimer decision has changed how Section 101 is handled. While the decision can be used to support arguments that motions to dismiss should not be granted because there are factual determinations to be made, Cory notes that most of the cases he’s seen "cite Berkheimer for the premise that it doesn't really change the fact that they can still decide most of these cases if there's not a reasonable dispute, and that they can still decide 101 with summary judgments." This impacts patent prosecution because in order to ensure there is a "reasonable dispute," it's important to include very detailed facts in patent specifications. Cory said, "It’s really important to be very precise about what your improvement is, and tell that story in your application."
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.