July 18, 2018
Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property reached to Finnegan attorney Cory Bell for his thoughts on the impact of the Federal Circuit's Berkheimer v. HP decision.
The Berkheimer decision has changed how Section 101 is handled. While the decision can be used to support arguments that motions to dismiss should not be granted because there are factual determinations to be made, Cory notes that most of the cases he’s seen "cite Berkheimer for the premise that it doesn't really change the fact that they can still decide most of these cases if there's not a reasonable dispute, and that they can still decide 101 with summary judgments." This impacts patent prosecution because in order to ensure there is a "reasonable dispute," it's important to include very detailed facts in patent specifications. Cory said, "It’s really important to be very precise about what your improvement is, and tell that story in your application."
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.