June 30, 2023
Legal Dive
Given the recent narrowing of the application protections under the Lanham Act by the US Supreme Court, companies must enhance their foreign trademark rights and enforcement efforts.
The high court agreed with lower courts in Abitron v. Hetronic that Lanham is applicable to trademark penalties on foreign companies, even though the law isn’t extraterritorial, if their infringing activities are used “in commece” in the United States.
“One possible reading of that opinion is that the Lanham Act can only apply to allegedly infringing sales of goods or services made directly in the United States by the manufacturer, seller, or service provider,” Finnegan partner Mark Sommers told Legal Dive. “If that is the position adopted by lower courts, then companies will need to strengthen their foreign rights to ensure they can prevent infringing trademark uses abroad.”
Read “SCOTUS Abitron Decision Will Force Companies to Step-Up Foreign Trademark Rights”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.