直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

Q&A: Returning to Big Law After 'Once in a Career' Patent Gig

September 22, 2017

The National Law Journal

Trenton Ward, former Lead Administrative Patent Judge at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), recently joined Finnegan as a partner in the firm's Atlanta office. In an interview with The National Law Journal, Trenton discusses his time at the PTAB, why he joined Finnegan, and tips for attorneys practicing in front of the PTAB.

Trenton joined the Board to take on a once-in-a-career opportunity in a potential new venue for patent litigation. During his tenure, he presided over more than 250 America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings. He specifically spoke of the final written decision that he issued in U.S. Bancorp v. Retirement Capital Access Management, which was the first final written decision by the PTAB to implement the Supreme Court's guidance with respect to patent eligibility in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank.

In discussing why he joined Finnegan, the firm's clients and presence at the PTAB were a big draw for Trenton. It was particularly important to him to find a firm where he could represent clients on both the petitioner and patent owner side, providing balance between the parties. 

For attorneys practicing in front of the PTAB, Trenton noted that when he was a judge, he appreciated counsel that had an understanding of what was important to the panel's decision with respect to patentability. He also feels that it is important for practitioners to keep in mind that the PTAB is a fluid jurisprudence.

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), administrative patent judge (APJ)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP