直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

Q&A: Returning to Big Law After 'Once in a Career' Patent Gig

September 22, 2017

The National Law Journal

Trenton Ward, former Lead Administrative Patent Judge at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), recently joined Finnegan as a partner in the firm's Atlanta office. In an interview with The National Law Journal, Trenton discusses his time at the PTAB, why he joined Finnegan, and tips for attorneys practicing in front of the PTAB.

Trenton joined the Board to take on a once-in-a-career opportunity in a potential new venue for patent litigation. During his tenure, he presided over more than 250 America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings. He specifically spoke of the final written decision that he issued in U.S. Bancorp v. Retirement Capital Access Management, which was the first final written decision by the PTAB to implement the Supreme Court's guidance with respect to patent eligibility in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank.

In discussing why he joined Finnegan, the firm's clients and presence at the PTAB were a big draw for Trenton. It was particularly important to him to find a firm where he could represent clients on both the petitioner and patent owner side, providing balance between the parties. 

For attorneys practicing in front of the PTAB, Trenton noted that when he was a judge, he appreciated counsel that had an understanding of what was important to the panel's decision with respect to patentability. He also feels that it is important for practitioners to keep in mind that the PTAB is a fluid jurisprudence.

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), administrative patent judge (APJ)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP