June 30, 2021
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in United States v. Arthrex, giving the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the power to review the decisions of administrative patent judges (APJs). Finnegan partner Jason Romrell provided his thoughts on the ruling.
Jason said, “It is likely that the PTO will soon issue guidance as to how this discretionary review process will be implemented. It remains to be seen how often the director will actually exercise this new discretionary review authority, and how often discretionary review will actually make a difference in the outcome.”
Read “PTO Changes to Follow Supreme Court’s Arthrex Ruling, Attorneys Predict”
Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), administrative patent judge (APJ), United States v. Arthrex, Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew , Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.