直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

PTO Changes to Follow Supreme Court’s Arthrex Ruling, Attorneys Predict

June 30, 2021

Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property

The Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in United States v. Arthrex, giving the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the power to review the decisions of administrative patent judges (APJs). Finnegan partner Jason Romrell provided his thoughts on the ruling.

Jason said, “It is likely that the PTO will soon issue guidance as to how this discretionary review process will be implemented. It remains to be seen how often the director will actually exercise this new discretionary review authority, and how often discretionary review will actually make a difference in the outcome.”

Read “PTO Changes to Follow Supreme Court’s Arthrex Ruling, Attorneys Predict”

Tags

Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), administrative patent judge (APJ), United States v. Arthrex, Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew , Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Jason L. Romrell
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4349
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP