June 30, 2021
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in United States v. Arthrex, giving the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the power to review the decisions of administrative patent judges (APJs). Finnegan partner Jason Romrell provided his thoughts on the ruling.
Jason said, “It is likely that the PTO will soon issue guidance as to how this discretionary review process will be implemented. It remains to be seen how often the director will actually exercise this new discretionary review authority, and how often discretionary review will actually make a difference in the outcome.”
Read “PTO Changes to Follow Supreme Court’s Arthrex Ruling, Attorneys Predict”
Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), administrative patent judge (APJ), United States v. Arthrex, Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew , Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.