June 30, 2021
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in United States v. Arthrex, giving the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the power to review the decisions of administrative patent judges (APJs). Finnegan partner Jason Romrell provided his thoughts on the ruling.
Jason said, “It is likely that the PTO will soon issue guidance as to how this discretionary review process will be implemented. It remains to be seen how often the director will actually exercise this new discretionary review authority, and how often discretionary review will actually make a difference in the outcome.”
Read “PTO Changes to Follow Supreme Court’s Arthrex Ruling, Attorneys Predict”
Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), administrative patent judge (APJ), United States v. Arthrex, Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew , Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
Press Release
August 19, 2026
Press Release
August 18, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up
August 12, 2026
Award/Ranking
Partner Jeffrey M. Jacobstein Named Finalist for New England Legal Awards
August 10, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.