直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Promoting Gender Diversity at the U.S. Patent Bar

July 23, 2021

World Intellectual Property Review

World Intellectual Property Review interviewed Finnegan partner Linda Thayer for her thoughts on gender diversity at the U.S. patent bar. Earlier this year, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released statistics showing the gender breakdown of who qualified for the patent bar exam under the various categories. The statistics revealed that 75% of candidates qualified under category A (having one of 32 specific bachelor’s degrees covering technical expertise such as biology, physics, chemical engineering and microbiology); 25% qualified under category B (having a non-listed bachelor’s degree, but having taken sufficient semester hours in physics, chemistry, biology, botany, microbiology, molecular biology, or engineering); and less than 1% under category C (having practical engineering or scientific experience). Of those who qualified under category A, 67% were men and 32% were women.

Linda said, “It appears more women had to qualify under the more onerous category B. It seems fairly obvious that women had to do so because their degrees were more frequently not among the category A-approved degrees. That they were ultimately successful under category B shows that their field of study was, in the end, found worthy, but they had to jump through more hoops to show it.” She added, “How many women may have been turned off by the additional requirements and decided not to apply? We may never know.”

Read “Promoting Gender Diversity at the U.S. Patent Bar”

Tags

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), women in IP

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP