直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Promoting Gender Diversity at the U.S. Patent Bar

July 23, 2021

World Intellectual Property Review

World Intellectual Property Review interviewed Finnegan partner Linda Thayer for her thoughts on gender diversity at the U.S. patent bar. Earlier this year, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released statistics showing the gender breakdown of who qualified for the patent bar exam under the various categories. The statistics revealed that 75% of candidates qualified under category A (having one of 32 specific bachelor’s degrees covering technical expertise such as biology, physics, chemical engineering and microbiology); 25% qualified under category B (having a non-listed bachelor’s degree, but having taken sufficient semester hours in physics, chemistry, biology, botany, microbiology, molecular biology, or engineering); and less than 1% under category C (having practical engineering or scientific experience). Of those who qualified under category A, 67% were men and 32% were women.

Linda said, “It appears more women had to qualify under the more onerous category B. It seems fairly obvious that women had to do so because their degrees were more frequently not among the category A-approved degrees. That they were ultimately successful under category B shows that their field of study was, in the end, found worthy, but they had to jump through more hoops to show it.” She added, “How many women may have been turned off by the additional requirements and decided not to apply? We may never know.”

Read “Promoting Gender Diversity at the U.S. Patent Bar”

Tags

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), women in IP

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Related News

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Best Lawyers in Germany Recognizes Dr. Dr. Jochen Herr in Recent Rankings

July 16, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP