直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Promoting Gender Diversity at the U.S. Patent Bar

July 23, 2021

World Intellectual Property Review

World Intellectual Property Review interviewed Finnegan partner Linda Thayer for her thoughts on gender diversity at the U.S. patent bar. Earlier this year, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released statistics showing the gender breakdown of who qualified for the patent bar exam under the various categories. The statistics revealed that 75% of candidates qualified under category A (having one of 32 specific bachelor’s degrees covering technical expertise such as biology, physics, chemical engineering and microbiology); 25% qualified under category B (having a non-listed bachelor’s degree, but having taken sufficient semester hours in physics, chemistry, biology, botany, microbiology, molecular biology, or engineering); and less than 1% under category C (having practical engineering or scientific experience). Of those who qualified under category A, 67% were men and 32% were women.

Linda said, “It appears more women had to qualify under the more onerous category B. It seems fairly obvious that women had to do so because their degrees were more frequently not among the category A-approved degrees. That they were ultimately successful under category B shows that their field of study was, in the end, found worthy, but they had to jump through more hoops to show it.” She added, “How many women may have been turned off by the additional requirements and decided not to apply? We may never know.”

Read “Promoting Gender Diversity at the U.S. Patent Bar”

Tags

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), women in IP

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP