On October 13, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States granted cert in Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Inc., a case that questions whether the appointment of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) judges is constitutional. Law360 interviewed Finnegan partner Erika Arner for her reaction to the Court’s decision to hear a case that will impact hundreds of patent cases.
The Supreme Court’s decision will determine whether the PTAB’s administrative patent judges are principal officers, requiring presidential appointment and U.S. Senate confirmation, or inferior officers, requiring no confirmation and can be appointed by a department head. Erika said, “These big questions, like what is an inferior officer and what kinds of decisions are they able to make and how is Congress able to empower them, I think we need to remember that the Supreme Court likely views those through a much broader lens than just the Patent and Trademark Office.”
Read the full article here.
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.