In July 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued guidance suggesting that filing a single petition at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) challenging a patent’s validity should be sufficient, and that petitioners filing simultaneous validity challenges should explain the differences and rank them in order of importance. This guidance has many practitioners concerned that legitimate challenges may be overlooked just because parties file several petitions. Bloomberg Law contacted Finnegan partner and former PTAB administrative law judge Trenton Ward for his thoughts.
Trenton said, “Until we know those circumstances in which we know it’s appropriate to have more than one petition, I think there’s going to be a lot of questions.” He noted that previously, the PTAB’s perspective on patent challengers filing a second petition allowed them to “achieve more space” for their arguments. Now, the new guidance “implies you don’t just need more pages,” he said.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.