April 16, 2021
Managing Intellectual Property
As a result of the COVID pandemic, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit postponed oral arguments, and many cases were left to be decided on the briefs. Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Charles Collins-Chase for insight into how attorneys have adjusted their strategies for preparing strong briefs knowing there may not be an oral argument.
Pre-pandemic, Charles would conduct a mock court session before an oral argument. Now, he conducts the session before preparing reply briefs to provide an opportunity to address potential questions the court may raise, thus strengthening the response. He said, “Without argument, the reply brief is really your last chance as an appellant to persuade the court to reverse. So, if the court cancels oral argument, I can guarantee that we’ve done everything to present the case in the most favorable way possible.”
Read “One Year on: How Counsel Tackle Federal Circuit Briefs Rulings”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.