April 16, 2021
Managing Intellectual Property
As a result of the COVID pandemic, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit postponed oral arguments, and many cases were left to be decided on the briefs. Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Charles Collins-Chase for insight into how attorneys have adjusted their strategies for preparing strong briefs knowing there may not be an oral argument.
Pre-pandemic, Charles would conduct a mock court session before an oral argument. Now, he conducts the session before preparing reply briefs to provide an opportunity to address potential questions the court may raise, thus strengthening the response. He said, “Without argument, the reply brief is really your last chance as an appellant to persuade the court to reverse. So, if the court cancels oral argument, I can guarantee that we’ve done everything to present the case in the most favorable way possible.”
Read “One Year on: How Counsel Tackle Federal Circuit Briefs Rulings”
Award/Ranking
Best Lawyers in Germany Recognizes Dr. Dr. Jochen Herr in Recent Rankings
July 16, 2026
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.