直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

More Than Fintiv: What to Know About the PTAB Revision Bill

October 1, 2021

Law360

On September 29, 2021, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced a bipartisan bill aimed at narrowing the use of discretionary denials by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The bill also addresses provisions on estoppel, grounds for invalidation, and deadlines. Law360 interviewed Finnegan partner Barbara McCurdy, who believes the new estoppel provisions could have a huge impact on patent litigation.

The new bill includes multiple proposed changes to estoppel provisions. Under current law, if the PTAB refused to invalidate the patent in its final written decision, a challenger cannot raise the same invalidity arguments in district court litigation. This petitioner estoppel begins when the final written decision is issued; however, the new bill would wait until all appeals have been exhausted. While a district court may be willing to wait a year or two for PTAB proceedings before it hears a case, Barbara said it's less likely the court will stay a case for three or more years, which means district court litigation could increase.

Another provision would prevent the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) from giving the patent owner a new patent based on the invalidated invention. Barbara said this would provide stability and end what she calls “winner estoppel,” which is when a petitioner who wins at the PTAB is barred from raising those same winning arguments in the district court.

Read “More Than Fintiv: What to Know About the PTAB Revision Bill”

Tags

estoppel

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Barbara C. McCurdy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4047
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP