直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

Lawyers Weigh in on PTAB Cases at the High Court

April 24, 2018

Law360

On April 24, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued decisions in Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group LLC and SAS Institute v. Iancu, two cases that revolved around America Invents Act (AIA) reviews. SAS Institute is a case that questioned whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) should decide on the validity of all challenged claims in AIA reviews, rather than just selected claims. Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Josh Goldberg for his thoughts on the SAS Institute decision. 

Josh said, "This morning is about Oil States. This afternoon and the coming months will be about SAS. Not only did the Supreme Court reverse the Federal Circuit and hold that SAS is entitled to a final written decision addressing all of the claims it has challenged, the Supreme Court also telegraphed that petitioners are entitled to final written decisions addressing all of the grounds in their petitions. The Supreme Court’s decision thus has the potential to upend the entire patent challenge process. The board, petitioners, and patent owners will need to figure out what to do with cases in which the board only instituted review for some of the claims.”

Tags

SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Joshua L. Goldberg
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 202 408 6092
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP