直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

How to Make Patent Office Guidance Work for You at PTAB

March 16, 2018

Law360

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) often issues guidance memos to patent examiners, addressing issues such as patent eligibility and how to apply important decisions from the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit. However, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently indicated that it is not bound by guidance memos issued to USPTO examiners. Many attorneys disagree with that approach and feel that guidance can help litigants form their case when arguing before the PTAB. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Erika Arner for her thoughts. 

Erika said, "I think the mistake a lot of people make is holding up the guidance as the official position of the patent office and trying to pin it on the board: 'You said this, so you’re stuck with it.'" She noted that while the guidance can be very helpful in identifying relevant case law that can support the litigant's argument, she wouldn't advise citing the guidance explicitly to the board. Given that patent eligibility has many uncertainties, she understands where parties are coming from in seeking clarity from the patent office, however, she said, "That's not what the guidance is. There's no magic bullet."

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Erika Harmon Arner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 571 203 2754
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP