The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) often issues guidance memos to patent examiners, addressing issues such as patent eligibility and how to apply important decisions from the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit. However, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently indicated that it is not bound by guidance memos issued to USPTO examiners. Many attorneys disagree with that approach and feel that guidance can help litigants form their case when arguing before the PTAB. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Erika Arner for her thoughts.
Erika said, "I think the mistake a lot of people make is holding up the guidance as the official position of the patent office and trying to pin it on the board: 'You said this, so you’re stuck with it.'" She noted that while the guidance can be very helpful in identifying relevant case law that can support the litigant's argument, she wouldn't advise citing the guidance explicitly to the board. Given that patent eligibility has many uncertainties, she understands where parties are coming from in seeking clarity from the patent office, however, she said, "That's not what the guidance is. There's no magic bullet."
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.