直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

How the Federal Circuit’s Patent Docket Changed in 2017

February 19, 2018

Law360

Since the introduction of America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings in 2012, the Federal Circuit has experienced an increase in cases appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Boad (PTAB). Law360 reached to Finnegan partner Erik Puknys for his thoughts on how the Federal Circuit is managing its patent docket. 

Erik said, "There was this enormous influx right away, but the court’s done a good job of adjusting to it, and you’re seeing that not only in the number of cases coming through, but also in the court’s use of Rule 36 decisions." Rule 36 decisions--one sentence rulings that affirm the lower court's opinion with no explanation--are often used by the court to dispose of a case quickly. Additionally, statistics show that the Federal Circuit likelihood of upholding a lower court decision increased to three out of four patent appeals in 2017. Erik said, "The court has been criticized in the past for being a little too willing to reverse, but a one-in-four reversal rate is a natural side effect of dealing with patent cases that concern complex issues of law. Pending the decision in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group, Erik believes these statistics will be the new normal for the Federal Circuit.

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Offices

Palo Alto, CA

Related Professionals

Erik R. Puknys
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6644
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP