直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

How Food Brands Stem Cannabis Knock-Offs

May 20, 2021

Managing Intellectual Property

Many cannabis businesses are capitalizing on popular food and beverage brand names to sell their products. Brands like Wrigley’s Skittles, Starburst, and Life Savers have been used in association with cannabis products though they were not licensed through the parent company. This has caused food and beverage companies to crack down on cannabis companies infringing on their trademarks or causing confusion in the marketplace. Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Mark Sommers for his insight on this issue.

Despite receiving cease and desist letters from the trademark owners, if the trademark is not registered in the cannabis industry, some cannabis companies refuse to back down. However, according to Mark, when a brand’s product is unrelated to cannabis, to show infringement, the brand owner may be able to point to a defendant’s intent. If the company is able to show that the cannabis business sought to trade off its goodwill, it may be able to win its case.

Read the full article here.

Tags

likelihood of confusion, cannabis and cannabinoids

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Food and Beverage

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP