直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

How Food Brands Stem Cannabis Knock-Offs

May 20, 2021

Managing Intellectual Property

Many cannabis businesses are capitalizing on popular food and beverage brand names to sell their products. Brands like Wrigley’s Skittles, Starburst, and Life Savers have been used in association with cannabis products though they were not licensed through the parent company. This has caused food and beverage companies to crack down on cannabis companies infringing on their trademarks or causing confusion in the marketplace. Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Mark Sommers for his insight on this issue.

Despite receiving cease and desist letters from the trademark owners, if the trademark is not registered in the cannabis industry, some cannabis companies refuse to back down. However, according to Mark, when a brand’s product is unrelated to cannabis, to show infringement, the brand owner may be able to point to a defendant’s intent. If the company is able to show that the cannabis business sought to trade off its goodwill, it may be able to win its case.

Read the full article here.

Tags

likelihood of confusion, cannabis and cannabinoids

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Food and Beverage

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins IP Firm of the Year at the 2026 LSPN Awards

May 1, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP