On March 26, 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Federal Circuit to take another look at finding that breast cancer genes isolated by Myriad Genetics, Inc. are patentable, in light of the high court’s Mayo v. Prometheus decision that methods covering laws of nature alone are unpatentable. Finnegan partner Erika H. Arner stated, “The forceful decision in Prometheus means that the Federal Circuit has its work cut out for it in reviewing the Myriad case on remand. The Federal Circuit is going to have to explain to the extent that isolated genes originated in a human subject, was enough done to natural subject matter to create a patentable invention.” Additionally, “the appeals court will also have to address in some way the Supreme Court’s statement in Prometheus that patents involving laws of nature could have the effect of inhibiting future innovation.”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.