April 24, 2018
Bloomberg Law
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must address all challenged claims in America Invents Act (AIA) reviews, and the board can no longer select which challenged claims to rule. Attorneys agree that the decision will impact how the PTAB handles AIA proceedings. Bloomberg Law contacted Finnegan attorney Erika Arner for her thoughts on the Supreme Court's decision.
Erika said, "Overall this is going to increase the workload for not only the PTAB, but for the parties as well." She also noted that the PTAB may feel that it needs to not only address all the challenged claims, but also every basis for a challenge, which will result in more complex cases in an already complex process.
The SAS decision also makes estoppel apply more broadly, which is favorable to patent owners. Erika predicted that district courts will be more willing to put a hold on their own proceedings to give the PTAB a chance to rule on a corresponding IPR, given that more issues will now be resolved.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.