直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

High Court Ruling Changes Patent Office Challenge Dynamics

April 24, 2018

Bloomberg Law

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must address all challenged claims in America Invents Act (AIA) reviews, and the board can no longer select which challenged claims to rule. Attorneys agree that the decision will impact how the PTAB handles AIA proceedings. Bloomberg Law contacted Finnegan attorney Erika Arner for her thoughts on the Supreme Court's decision. 

Erika said, "Overall this is going to increase the workload for not only the PTAB, but for the parties as well." She also noted that the PTAB may feel that it needs to not only address all the challenged claims, but also every basis for a challenge, which will result in more complex cases in an already complex process. 

The SAS decision also makes estoppel apply more broadly, which is favorable to patent owners. Erika predicted that district courts will be more willing to put a hold on their own proceedings to give the PTAB a chance to rule on a corresponding IPR, given that more issues will now be resolved.

Tags

SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Erika Harmon Arner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 571 203 2754
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP