April 24, 2018
Bloomberg Law
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must address all challenged claims in America Invents Act (AIA) reviews, and the board can no longer select which challenged claims to rule. Attorneys agree that the decision will impact how the PTAB handles AIA proceedings. Bloomberg Law contacted Finnegan attorney Erika Arner for her thoughts on the Supreme Court's decision.
Erika said, "Overall this is going to increase the workload for not only the PTAB, but for the parties as well." She also noted that the PTAB may feel that it needs to not only address all the challenged claims, but also every basis for a challenge, which will result in more complex cases in an already complex process.
The SAS decision also makes estoppel apply more broadly, which is favorable to patent owners. Erika predicted that district courts will be more willing to put a hold on their own proceedings to give the PTAB a chance to rule on a corresponding IPR, given that more issues will now be resolved.
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.