April 24, 2018
Bloomberg Law
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must address all challenged claims in America Invents Act (AIA) reviews, and the board can no longer select which challenged claims to rule. Attorneys agree that the decision will impact how the PTAB handles AIA proceedings. Bloomberg Law contacted Finnegan attorney Erika Arner for her thoughts on the Supreme Court's decision.
Erika said, "Overall this is going to increase the workload for not only the PTAB, but for the parties as well." She also noted that the PTAB may feel that it needs to not only address all the challenged claims, but also every basis for a challenge, which will result in more complex cases in an already complex process.
The SAS decision also makes estoppel apply more broadly, which is favorable to patent owners. Erika predicted that district courts will be more willing to put a hold on their own proceedings to give the PTAB a chance to rule on a corresponding IPR, given that more issues will now be resolved.
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.