直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Firms Eye ITC Opportunities Post-Lashify Ruling

March 13, 2025

Managing Intellectual Property

In 2024, there was an uptick in US International Trade Commission (ITC) cases, and that trend could continue into 2025, especially in light of a recent ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

In early April, the Federal Circuit said that the ITC applied a legally incorrect understanding of the test for the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement.

The court vacated the ITC’s ruling that Lashify, a beauty company, did not meet the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The economic prong means that there must be an industry in the US related to the patent that has been asserted.

With that, the ITC asserted that Lashify failed to satisfy this requirement after the forum excluded expenses relating to sales, marketing, warehousing, quality control, and distribution from its analysis.

The ruling overturned the ITC’s established practice of excluding this type of evidence from its consideration of the economic prong.

Speaking on how this development may impact law firms, Finnegan partner Smith Brittingham told Managing IP that there’s a likelihood that more clients will feel comfortable trying to satisfy the domestic industry and file a complaint.

“The decision removes some doubt or concerns for some types of companies that might have worried that their domestic industry allegations are borderline. As a result, I wouldn’t be surprised if more companies feel comfortable going to the ITC,” he said. “Nobody wants to go to the ITC and win on everything but domestic industry.”

He added that he hasn’t heard from any potential complainants yet.

“I’ve heard from at least one in-house counsel who doesn’t love the idea of potentially having more ITC cases filed against them,” he says. “From the respondent’s side, there is understandable concern that this will expand the universe of potential complainants.”

What is to come in 2025 as a result of this ruling is still unclear, however firms did see some ITC opportunities in 2024.

A report from expert witness agency WIT Legal found that there were 52 ITC investigations in 2024, a 41% increase from 37 in 2023. Patent-related investigations at the ITC also went up from 32 in 2023 to 40 in 2024, a rise of 25%.

Smith notes that the number of investigations in 2023 was “really low”.

“One of the questions everybody had was whether 2023 was a trend or just a blip. Maybe we have the same question about 2024. But overall, most people seem to be satisfied that 2023 was more of an aberration,” he said.

Firms are also paying attention to the types of companies that are filing at the ITC.

Smith said that the number of non-practicing entity (NPE) complaints at the ITC declined significantly in 2023. But even though the number of cases increased in 2024, the NPE-driven cases didn’t go up significantly that year.

“So, these are cases that are presumably being filed by more traditional ITC complainants rather than just a return to a large number of NPE cases.”

Read “Firms Eye ITC Opportunities Post-Lashify Ruling”

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Smith R. Brittingham
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4158
Email

Related News

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP