Dissenting opinions are rare at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), but former judges explain that it's not because the Board feels discouraged by officials to offer dissenting opinions, but it's because the Board strives to reach a consensus. Law360 interviewed Finnegan partner Trenton Ward--a PTAB judge from 2012-2017--to discuss dissenting opinions at the PTAB.
Trenton said, "In my mind, there is not discouragement from management of individuals writing dissents and concurrences. I'm not aware of situations where judges did not receive credit for writing a concurrence or a dissent." He went on to say, "The goal of the judges is to reach a consensus with respect to the outcome. Often there are multiple avenues to reach an outcome, and to the extent the panel can choose one that all members agree on, that's often the path that's chosen." He also noted that while the PTAB's decisions are often unanimous and written by one judge, all members of the panel are involved in the decision-making process, which he found to be extremely beneficial.
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Award/Ranking
Managing IP Americas Awards 2024: Finnegan Shortlisted for Nine Awards, Including Firm of the Year
March 12, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.